<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Enter LOAF - The Power of Simplicity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dalager.com/blog/2004/01/30/enter-loaf-the-power-of-simplicity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dalager.com/blog/2004/01/30/enter-loaf-the-power-of-simplicity/</link>
	<description>Personlig weblog for Christian Dalager (f.1973)</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 17:02:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: donald</title>
		<link>http://dalager.com/blog/2004/01/30/enter-loaf-the-power-of-simplicity/#comment-3506</link>
		<dc:creator>donald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2004 01:29:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dalager.com/blog/2004/01/30/enter-loaf-the-power-of-simplicity/#comment-3506</guid>
		<description>Wow! 
Language Object Abstraction Freedom, LOAF or what?
or
Lowlevel Oriented Algorithmic Fusion!

Nothing's gonna stop us now.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow!<br />
Language Object Abstraction Freedom, LOAF or what?<br />
or<br />
Lowlevel Oriented Algorithmic Fusion!</p>
<p>Nothing&#8217;s gonna stop us now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dalager</title>
		<link>http://dalager.com/blog/2004/01/30/enter-loaf-the-power-of-simplicity/#comment-3505</link>
		<dc:creator>dalager</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2004 16:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dalager.com/blog/2004/01/30/enter-loaf-the-power-of-simplicity/#comment-3505</guid>
		<description>And Pollas - the beautiful thing about LOAF is that it is generalized in a way that makes it well-suited for implementing the counter-FOAF functionality that you suggest. And in just a few lines of code!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And Pollas - the beautiful thing about LOAF is that it is generalized in a way that makes it well-suited for implementing the counter-FOAF functionality that you suggest. And in just a few lines of code!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anders</title>
		<link>http://dalager.com/blog/2004/01/30/enter-loaf-the-power-of-simplicity/#comment-3504</link>
		<dc:creator>Anders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2004 14:49:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dalager.com/blog/2004/01/30/enter-loaf-the-power-of-simplicity/#comment-3504</guid>
		<description>Oh, I thought LOAF was like FOAF for the rest of us. Not as much a network as the name FOAF suggests, more a kind of an acronym explaining the sort of friend - "Loser-Of-A-Friend". Use: "Has he got FOAF?" "No, he's a LOAF"... And it's all in the word really... (a shaped mass of baked bread/lounge around " )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I thought LOAF was like FOAF for the rest of us. Not as much a network as the name FOAF suggests, more a kind of an acronym explaining the sort of friend - &#8220;Loser-Of-A-Friend&#8221;. Use: &#8220;Has he got FOAF?&#8221; &#8220;No, he&#8217;s a LOAF&#8221;&#8230; And it&#8217;s all in the word really&#8230; (a shaped mass of baked bread/lounge around &#8221; )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
